Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 02:07
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Thank you.
$10,000 2-year CD accounts: Here's why they're worth opening now - CBS News
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Have you ever met somebody so stupid that they made you question how they survived this long?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What’s next?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
'Rock Showman' uncovers sandstone stegosaur near Whitby - BBC
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
More on Apple’s Trust-Eroding ‘F1 The Movie’ Wallet Ad - Daring Fireball
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
How do flat Earthers explain the existence of other spherical planets?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Russia can stop this any time.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Homesellers now outnumber buyers by half a million: Redfin - NewsNation
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Light Squeezed Out of Darkness in Surprising Quantum Simulation - ScienceAlert